Thomas R. Cornish v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Judicial pay; Judicial COLAs; Bankruptcy judges; 28 U.S.C. § 153(a); Beer v. United States.
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge
This is an action for back pay brought by an active duty bankruptcy judge. Judge Cornish’s compensation is set by statute to “equal 92 percent of the salary of a judge of the district court of the United States as determined pursuant to [28 U.S.C.] section 135.” 28 U.S.C. § 153(a) (2006). Plaintiff contends that he has not received his full statutory compensation because the compen sation of district court judges has been improperly reduced due to Congress’s failure to pay district…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. WeldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Stewart v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barbara J. Houser v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Cornish v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014