Legal Opinion

Henry v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 23, 1955PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, District Judge.

In accordance with plaintiff’s request I have considered briefs on defendant’s motion to dismiss. I find no basis for changing the conclusion indicated at the trial. The complaint is dismissed because upon the facts and the law plaintiff has shown no right to relief.

My conclusion is reached as trier of the facts as well as the law. Accordingly, I have not given the most favorable possible view to plaintiff’s testimony. On the contrary, I give it only such weight as I believe it worth in the light of the credibility of his witnesses. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 41(b), 28…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Doucette v. VincentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
  2. Beadle v. SpencerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Bach v. Friden Calculating MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  4. Allred v. SasserCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  5. The SaratogaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. MylanderNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. United States v. Continental Can CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  3. Schultz v. Wills (In Re Wills)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
  4. United States v. BartholomewDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1956
  5. Adams v. The Barge UBL 118District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API