Legal Opinion

Copp v. Hague

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 9, 1994PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, J.

This is an action for the alleged breach by defendants Robert E. Hague (“Hague”) and Modern Key Shop, Inc. (“Modern”) of a contract entered into with the plaintiff’s testator, Paul C. Copp (“Copp”). The plaintiff has appealed the trial judge’s finding for the defendants.3

The reported evidence indicates that Copp had been a locksmith doing business as “Modern Key Shop” for a period of years during which he became friendly with Hague who had never been a locksmith. After a series of discussions, the two agreed that Hague would buy Copp’s business for $67,000.00. Both understood that Hague…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Liberatore v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Stella v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Ricky Smith Pontiac, Inc. v. Subaru of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  5. Parker v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Green v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  2. Chiappetta v. LyonsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
  3. Gonsalves v. European Engineering Sales & Service, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Saab v. Norton Family, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  5. Baybank v. PandolfinoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API