Legal Opinion
Seippel v. Jenkens & Gilchrist, P.C.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 25, 2004No. 03 Civ. 6942(SAS)PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case arises out of tax and consulting services offered by several professional law, financial services and accounting firms. Plaintiffs, William and Sharon Se-ippel, filed this suit on September 10, 2003, alleging that defendants violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962, and are liable for damages and other relief arising from breach of fiduciary duty, inducing breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract, malpractice, “unethical, excessive,…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Khan v. BDO Seidman, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Khan v. Deutsche Bank AGIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
- Spinelli v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- In re Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.