Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Mylne
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 15, 1849PublishedCited by 6 opinions
from tire Fifth District Court of New Orleans, Buchanan, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court (Eustis, C. J. not sitting, having been of counsel for plaintiff',) was pronounced by
Rost,, J.
Before the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Thompson v. Mylne, in 2 Rob. 349, the defendant had filed two accounts, showing the situation of George B. Milligan with the firm of A. (& J. Dennistoun & Co., and with the Bellechasse plantation. After the case was remanded, the intervenors, who appear from that time to have superseded the plaintiff in the management of it, filed an opposition on a great variety of grounds, among which are the following: 1. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lafarge v. MorganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1822
- Kittridge v. BreaudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
- Kittridge v. BreaudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
- Oakey v. DuncanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
3Cited by6 opinions
- Webb v. . BuckelewNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Albritton v. ShawSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Edenborn v. BlacksherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Thomas's administrator v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1879
- Levingston Supply Co. v. BassoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.