Legal Opinion

Frankel v. Donovan

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided February 10, 1956PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marvel, Vice Chancellor:

Plaintiff, a stockholder of the corpo-

rate defendant suing in a representative capacity for all stockholders, complains that stock options granted in 1951 and 1952 by the corporate defendant to fifty of its executive employees under restricted stock option plans adopted by directors subject to approval by the stockholders,1 were invalid when issued because said options were allegedly gifts,2 having been granted without consideration. The forty-nine individual defendants have either exercised or hold exercisable options, the options of one deceased officer having lapsed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  5. Elster v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Michelson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Taussig v. Wellington Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  3. Ellis v. Emhart Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  4. Frankel v. DonovanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
  5. Robinson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API