Legal Opinion

In Re: Aqua Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 12, 2016No. 2015-1177PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

2Per curiam

ORDER

Appellant Aqua Products, Inc. filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. A response was invited of the Inter-venor, the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. 1 The petition and response were considered by the panel that heard the appeal, see Fed. Cir. R. 35 Practice Notes, and thereafter referred to the circuit judges in regular active service. A poll was requested and taken, and the court decided that the appeal warrants en banc consideration.

On consideration thereof,

It Is ORDERED That:(1) The petition for rehearing en banc filed…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prolitec, Inc. v. Scentair Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  2. In Re: Aqua Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aqua Products, Inc. v. MatalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  2. Veritas Technologies LLC v. Veeam Software CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Aqua Products, Inc. v. MatalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  4. Aqua Products, Inc. v. MatalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API