Legal Opinion

Vockel v. Rhynearson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1935No. 15,050PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKime, J.

The appellee filed a complaint herein, against the appellant, alleging that he, a pedestrian, had been injured by the negligence of the appellant while driving an automobile on a street in the city of Anderson. The specific acts of negligence charged in the complaint are that the appellant drove his automobile at a high, danger ous and unlawful rate of speed at the time while the roadway was wet and during the time it was raining; that he negligently failed to keep a lookout for pedestrians while so driving and that he negligently and unlawfully failed to give any notice or warning of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. HolcombIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Muncie Pulp Co. v. KeeslingIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Croatian Bros. Packing Co. v. RiceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. GillaspyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. King v. RansburgIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Neuwelt v. RoushIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Ft. Wayne Transit, Inc. v. Shomo, Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Shown v. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API