Julius Keller Construction Co. v. Herkless
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Rush Circuit Court; Alonzo Blair, Judge. Action by Arvel R. ITerkless and another against the Julius Keller Construction Company and another. From a judgment for plaintiffs, the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.
The substance of appellees’ complaint is as follows: In 1906, appellant city of Rushville by regular proceedings contracted with appellees, to furnish the-material and perform the work in the improvement of Arthur Street in said city from Third Street north to the corporation line. The work consisted of grading the roadway and surfacing it with broken stone, and constructing cement gutters and stone curbing along the line of the roadway on each side. The cost of the work was to be assessed against the abutting owners as provided by statute. Appellees after the work had commenced were…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Prest-O-Lite Co. v. SkeelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Casement v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Water Co. v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nash v. MeguscharIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- City of Winston-Salem v. FerrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Deep Vein Coal Co. v. RaineyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Henderson v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Crane v. Pangere & Logan, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.