Legal Opinion

City of Winston-Salem v. Ferrell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1986No. 8521SC132PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

I

We note that the order is interlocutory in two respects:

First, the issue of damages remains unresolved. The determination of liability nevertheless is immediately appealable. Highway Commission v. Nuckles, 271 N.C. 1, 13-14, 155 S.E. 2d 772, 783 (1967).

Second, the court failed to rule on the City’s third-party complaint against the contractor. As the judgment adjudicates “fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties,” and fails to state that the judgment is final or that there is no just reason for delay in accordance with N.C. Gen.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. City of Jacksonville v. SchumannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Moore v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Denny v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barker v. AgeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. National Advertising Co. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. City of Charlotte v. BMJ OF CHARLOTTE, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Board of Education of the Hickory Administrative School Unit v. SeagleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Peach v. City of High PointCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API