Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Chealander v. Morgan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1924No. 18771PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This case comes before us on a writ of review, granted after notice and hearing. The action was originally brought by the plaintiffs, as taxpayers, against only the defendants acting as a board of county commissioners, for the purpose of obtaining an injunction restraining the board from awarding a contract for the construction of a purported permanent highway in Snohomish county. At the time the action was commenced, a restraining order was issued until a hearing could be had, and while the restraining ordei-was still in force, a demurrer to plaintiffs’ complaint was filed and argued, which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pierce County v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Shanstrom v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. State ex rel. Bayless v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State ex rel. Daigneault v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Silver Basin Mining Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Greater Harbor 2000 v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Regan v. BabcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. State of California v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Wells v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API