Shanstrom v. Case
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered November 17,1917, in favor of tbe plaintiff, upon overruling a demurrer to tbe complaint, in an action for an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
— The respondent, wbo is a resident taxpayer of tbe city of Seattle, seeks in tbis action to enjoin tbe city of Seattle and its superintendent of streets from selling asphalt manufactured at its municipal plant, and from entering into any contract for sucb sale, until tbe city bas, by ordinance, fixed tbe price at wbicb sucb product may be sold.
*673It is alleged in the complaint that the city of Seattle is the owner of an asphalt plant erected at public expense from funds raised by general taxation, and that the plant was constructed for the purpose of equalizing prices of certain paving…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dirks v. CollinWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Miller v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mitchell v. Consolidated School District No. 201Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Sasse v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- State ex rel. Chealander v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- In Re Johnson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- McGirr v. FarleyWashington Supreme Court · 1944