Legal Opinion
Knapp v. Colorado River Water Conservation District
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 24, 1955No. 17,361PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
In this cause, now before us on review for the second time, the trial court, on rehearing following remand, determined total abandonment of the water rights under priority No. 129 in water district No. 51, by decree awarded to the Williams Fork Ditch on December 11, 1906, for 150 second feet of water for irrigation purposes, with priority thereto as of June 28, 1902, and entered judgment accordingly.
The opinion of this Court upon the first review of this matter is entitled, Peterson v. Colorado River Water Conservation District and reported in 127 Colo. 16, 254 P. (2d) 422. Following trial in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brighton Ditch Co. v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Fulton Irrigating Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1941
- Mason v. Hills Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Alamosa Creek Canal Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Green Valley Ditch Co. v. FrantzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dallas Creek Water Co. v. HueySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Navajo Development Co. v. SandersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Twin Lakes Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Municipal Subdistrict, Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Oxy USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.