Legal Opinion

Oklahoma City v. Hopcus

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 15, 1935No. 25741PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of the court of common pleas of Oklahoma county. In this opinion the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, the defendant in error as plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error as defendant.

The plaintiff instituted his suit in the district court of Oklahoma county. By proper order the ease was transferred to the court of common pleas.

The plaintiff was the owner of 73 acres of land SI miles by the meandering of the river northeast of Oklahoma City, adjacent to the North Canadian river. He alleged In his petition that the defendant had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Swift v. BroylesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Midland Valley R. Co. v. FulghamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Bokoshe Smokeless Coal Co. v. BraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. FloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Doe v. ColliganAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Moyer v. CordellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Clark v. CassettyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Goodyear v. DiscalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API