Legal Opinion

Hines v. Dollar

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 12, 1938No. 6 Div. 223PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The appeal and assignment of errors challenge the amount of the allowance to a guardian as compensation for extraordinary services rendered in the administration of a veteran’s affairs and in the estate of Joseph L. Vaughan, adjudged of unsound mind.

The allowance of attorney’s fees from the estate of wards was recently given extended discussion and consideration in the case of Frazer, as Guardian, v. First Nat. Bank of Mobile, Ala. Sup., 178 So. 441, and the pertinent authorities from this jurisdiction áre there collected. It is not necessary to further discuss the same at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frazer v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Dumas v. HollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. O'Neill v. DonnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  4. Crumpler v. DeensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cox v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API