Legal Opinion

Deatrick v. Lawless

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1923No. 23,805PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant cites Jones v. Darnall (1885), 103 Ind. 569, 53 Am. Rep. 545, insisting that the facts of that case and this one are parallel. If they are parallel, the judgment in this case must be reversed, on the authority of that one. Appellee has not filed a brief, but after the time for filing briefs had expired, attorneys who are shown by the record to have represented him in the trial court filed a petition on his behalf, asking this court to fix a time for them to present the case orally. The rules of court require that appellee shall file a brief, which shall contain a statement of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. DarnallIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Burroughs v. BurroughsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Roth v. Vandalia RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Rupel v. Ohio Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Robertson v. EwingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Meadows v. HickmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Bryant v. School Town of Oakland CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. BROWN, ADMR. ETC. v. MontgomeryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. MUCKER, ADMR. ETC. v. Pub. Svc. Comm. of Ind.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Mays v. ParkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API