Jones v. Darnall
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
This was a habeas corpus proceeding instituted by the appellee, Darnall, to obtain the custody of his infant son, Arthur J. Darnall, from the appellants, Jones and wife, who were the maternal grandparents of such infant. A writ of habeas corpus was duly issued, to which the appellants made return in writing, wherein they admitted that they were then in possession of Arthur J. Darnall, the infant son of the appellee and Susanna Belle Darnall, then deceased; but they said that Susanna Belle Darnall died about the 22d day of October, 1884; that appellee’s infant son was born on the 28th day of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Corrie v. CorrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- United States v. GreenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1824
- Joab v. SheetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Sturtevant v. State ex rel. HavensNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Ex parte KendallIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Hibbette v. BainesMississippi Supreme Court · 1900
- Bryan v. LyonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Berkshire v. CaleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Brooke v. LoganIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.