Legal Opinion

Rupel v. Ohio Oil Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1911No. 21,873PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From Jay Circuit Court; John F. LaFollette, Judge. Action by Martin L. Rupel and others against the Ohio Oil Company and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

Appellants Martin L. Rupel, Isaac Rupel, Jacob Rupel and Sarah Fields are, together with appellees James Rupel and Rachel Artwine, severally the owners of the remainder in fee simple, as tenants in common of a one-sixth interest in certain lands in Jay county. Appellee Mary Rupel, the mother, is the owner in possession of the life estate in these lands. As such life tenant in possession she, without the joining therein of the remaindermen sought to grant to the assignor of the appellee Ohio Oil Company, by contract in writing executed January 20, 1891, the exclusive right to enter upon these…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Williamson v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Bender v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Williamson v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Marshall v. MellonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fairbanks v. WarrumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Federal Land Bank v. MulhernSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  3. Kahle v. Crown Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Halbert v. HENDRIXIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Campbell v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API