Legal Opinion
Weinstein v. Chief of Police of Fall River
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 8, 1962PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.
The plaintiffs in this bill for declaratory relief are Trans-American Spinning Mills, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation engaged in the manufacturing business in Fall River, and Charles S. Weinstein, its treasurer and sole stockholder. The defendants, who are the chief of police of that city and the Attorney General, 1 demurred to the bill, the demurrer was sustained, a final decree was entered dismissing the bill, and the plaintiffs appealed.
The allegations of the bill are these. Weinstein, the treasurer and sole stockholder, is the one actually in charge of the “manufacturing” business of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hogan v. HoganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Town of Brookline v. Co-Ray Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Kilroy v. O'ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Nissenberg v. FellemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Brown v. NeelonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Moskow v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Karchmar v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Leto v. Board of Assessors of WilmingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Poremba v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Briggs v. CrowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.