Leto v. Board of Assessors of Wilmington
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCutteb, J.
Leto and others seek declaratory relief concerning the methods used in assessing property in Wilmington for 1964 taxes. In the companion case, the plaintiffs seek to restrain further action with respect to the 1964 tax assessment. A demurrer to each bill, addressed to the bill as a whole, was sustained. Each case has been reported by the trial judge for the decision of this court. See Gr. L. c. 214, § 30.
The bill in the Leto case alleges the following facts. In 1955 and 1956, the town established a “consistent scheme ... for ascertaining the fair cash value of all taxable real estate on a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bettigole v. Assessors of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Dowling v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Weinstein v. Chief of Police of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Amory v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- James Construction Co. v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Sydney v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- New England Legal Foundation v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Tregor v. Board of Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Frank J. Linhares Co., Inc. v. Reliance Ins. Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.