Legal Opinion
Wochnick v. TRUE ET UX
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
(Pro Tempore)
Plaintiff, Iva Wochnick, was the owner of an equity in a hotel at Seaside. The defendants True had previously been the owners of a jewelry business in Portland which had been operated by Mrs. True. The Trues sold the business to one Rothstein and took in return a note for the sum' of $18,000, payable in monthly installments and secured by what purported to be a chattel mortgage on the fixtures and stock of goods of the business so sold. The mortgage, which was recorded, provided the mortgagor would maintain the stock of merchandise at a sufficient value at cost to secure the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Sorenson v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- First Nat. Bank of Burns v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Kenney v. HurlburtOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. Deschutes CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Edwin C. Eberly and Elsie Eberly, Husband and Wife v. Frank A. Dudley, as Trustee of the Estate of Duvall's, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Dudley v. EberlyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1962
- In re DavisDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1961