Legal Opinion

In Re Michigan General Corp.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas

Decided September 16, 1987No. 19-30525PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REVISED MEMORANDUM OPINION *

HAROLD C. ABRAMSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

This decision concerns the qualifications and responsibilities of professionals who are employed by debtors in possession in reorganization proceedings. The several debtors listed in the caption above have sought to retain the accounting firm of Arthur Anderson & Co. as accountants for the estates and the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld as attorneys for the estates. This is a core proceeding which involves matters concerning the administration of the estates. 28 U.S.C. secs. 157, 1334; 11 U.S.C. secs. 327, 328,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Kendavis Industries International, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1988
  2. In Re Chicago Lutheran Hospital Ass'nUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  3. In Re Grabill Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  4. In Re Michigan General Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1987
  5. First Interstate Bank of Nevada, N.A. v. CIC Investment Corp. (In Re CIC Investment Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API