Outcault Advertising Co. v. Citizens State Bank of Roseau
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tlie district court for Roseau county to recover $564.60 upon a written contract. Defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. From an order, Watts, J., overruling the demurrer, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
Appeal by defendant from an order overruling a demurrer to the amended complaint, upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
It appears from the pleading that plaintiff is an Illinois corporation engaged in the preparation and furnishing of advertising matter for banks and other business concerns for hire, and that it has never complied with any of the laws of this state, relative to the right of foreign corporations to transact business in Minnesota. That the defendant .is a banking institution organized under the laws’ of Minnesota, and doing a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1920
- Victor Talking Machine Co. v. LuckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Rock Island Plow Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Bogata Mercantile Co. v. Outcault Advertising Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reynolds Metal Co. v. TL James & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Covey-Ballard Motor Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- Norm Advertising, Inc. v. ParkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Defender Auto-Lock Co. v. W. H. Schmelzel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Association of Army & Navy Stores, Inc. v. W. H. Bruen & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930