Legal Opinion

Defender Auto-Lock Co. v. W. H. Schmelzel Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 7, 1923No. 23,663PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiff is a foreign corporation with its principal office in the state of Michigan. It brought this action claiming that on or about September 25, 1920, it sold to the defendant goods, wares and merchandise, consisting of automobile shock absorbers at the agreed price of $2,100 upon which $1,000 had been paid, leaving a balance of $1,100 unpaid.

The defendant interposed an answer containing a general denial, and then alleged that the plaintiff was a foreign corporation and that the contract, if made at all, was made in the state of Minnesota, and that the plaintiff had not complied with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Victor Talking Machine Co. v. LuckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Baxter v. ShermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Outcault Advertising Co. v. Citizens State Bank of RoseauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Association of Army & Navy Stores, Inc. v. W. H. Bruen & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API