Legal Opinion

Bajaj v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (Hud)

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 18, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2021-1149Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PARMINDER BAJAJ, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1149 (RDM) SCOTT TURNER, 1 et al., in his official capacity as Secretary and Head of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Parminder Bajaj brings this action against the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, alleging race, sex, national origin, and age discrimination; failure to accommodate; hostile work environment; and constructive…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API