Legal Opinion

Lindskov v. Lindskov

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2011No. 25621PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Dennis Lindskov purchased Les Lindskov’s interest in Automotive Company, Inc. Dennis and Les signed a dissolution agreement that contained a non-disparagement clause. When Les opened a competing business within months of the sale of his interest in the company, Dennis initiated this breach of contract and fraud and deceit action, alleging that the non-disparagement clause contained a covenant not to compete. The trial court granted Les’s motions for summary judgment on both causes of action and dismissed Dennis’s complaint. We affirm.

Background

[¶ 2.] Automotive…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hayes v. Northern Hills General HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Janis v. Nash Finch Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Mueller v. Cedar Shore Resort, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Danielson v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Schultz v. ScandrettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2024
  4. Expansion Capital Group, LLC v. PattersonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2021
  5. In re: Polaris Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API