Legal Opinion
In re: Polaris Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 26, 2020No. 0:18-cv-00939Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re Polaris Marketing, Sales Practices, Case No. 18-cv-0939 (WMW/DTS) and Products Liability Litigation ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ first amended consolidated class-action complaint for lack of standing and for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Dkt. 86.) For the reasons addressed below, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants’ motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are 14 individuals who…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Jane Marie Egerdahl v. Hibbing Community College Minnesota Community College System State of Minnesota Myron Schmidt Anthony Kuznik and Jerry KrauseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.