Legal Opinion
Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided July 25, 2024No. 4:22-cv-04112Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION BUERGOFOL GMBH, 4:22-CV-04112-KES Plaintiff, vs. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART OMEGA’S MOTION OMEGA LINER COMPANY, INC., TO AMEND AND DENYING BUERGOFOL’S MOTION TO STRIKE AND DISMISS Defendant. Plaintiff, Buergofol GmbH, filed an amended complaint on July 13, 2023, alleging that defendant, Omega Liner Company, Inc., is infringing two of its patents—the ’882 Patent and the ’269 Patent. Docket 163. On July 27, 2023, Omega filed an answer and counterclaims to the amended complaint. Docket 179. On September 1,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Zutz v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Miller v. Redwood Toxicology Laboratory, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.