Legal Opinion
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Deming
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 16, 2015No. 14-CV-13201-LTSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SOROKIN, United States District Judge
This case involves negligence resulting from an overflowed bathtub at a Trinity Place Condominium unit on May 27, 2013. Pacific Indemnity Company (“Pacific”) insured the damaged unit and brings this action as the subrogee against John Deming (“Deming”) in the amount of $351,159.01. It is undisputed that Deming was negligent in allowing his bathtub to overflow. The sole issue before the Court is whether Pacific’s rights to subrogation have been…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Theodore L. Leblanc v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Barbour v. Dynamics Research Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pacific Indemnity Company v. DemingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016