Legal Opinion

Fox v. Pittsburg State University

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided June 26, 2017No. Case No. 14-CV-2606-JARPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JULIE A. ROBINSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

A jury rendered a verdict in favor of Plaintiff Martha Fox on claims for damages arising under Title VII and Title IX against Defendant Pittsburg State University (“PSU”), and the Court entered judgment on the verdict. The parties have now filed post-trial motions.1 The motions are fully briefed and the Court is prepared to rule. For the reasons explained more fully below, the Court denies Defendants Motion for Renewed Judgment as a Matter of Law as to the Title IX Claim (Doc. 207) and denies Defendant’s Motion for Renewed…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Austin Hartel v. Board of Regents for the University of Oklahoma et al.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026
  2. BURNETT v. OCEAN PROPERTIES LTDDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
  3. Brown v. McDonoughDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022
  4. Conviser v. DePaul UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  5. Conviser v. DePaul UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API