Legal Opinion
Conviser v. DePaul University
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 9, 2023No. 1:20-cv-03094Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DR. JENNY H. CONVISER and ASCEND CONSULATION IN HEALH CARE, LLC, Plaintiffs, No. 20-cv-03094 Judge Franklin U. Valderrama v. DEPAUL UNIVERSITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The breadth of Title IX is, once again, before the Court. Plaintiffs Dr. Jenny H. Conviser (Dr. Conviser) and Ascend Consultation in Health Care, LLC (Ascend) (collectively, Plaintiffs) have filed a Second Amended Complaint (SAC) against DePaul University (DePaul) asserting wrongful retaliation under Title IX, 20 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.