Legal Opinion
United States v. Terrell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 20, 2006No. 05-1231PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Although Richard Terrell was sentenced below the applicable range provided by the United States Sentencing Guidelines, he appeals his sentence, contending that the district court erred by giving too much weight to the Guidelines and not enough consideration to the other factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, see United States v. Chavez-Diaz, No. 05-2288, slip op. at 9-12 (10th Cir. April 18, 2006) (holding that we have jurisdiction to review challenge to district court’s refusal to depart downward further), and affirm the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Robert MykytiukCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. KristlCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. CrockettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Jermaine HuntCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. CageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Larry BegayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Portillo-QuezadaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. KandirakisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.