Legal Opinion

United States v. Crockett

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 31, 2006No. 04-4204PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f). The case is therefore submitted without oral argument.

Defendant was charged in a four-count indictment with one count of conspiring to defraud the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and three counts of aiding and assisting in the preparation of false and fraudulent tax returns, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2). A jury found him guilty on all four counts.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. United States v. BedfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. Cordova v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States of America, Plaintif-Appellant v. Albert Ganier, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Pilatus Business Aircraft, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API