United States v. Kandirakis
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
SENTENCING MEMORANDUM
YOUNG, District Judge.
“What is overlooked in post -Booker discussions is the fact that, for seventeen years, federal courts had been sentencing offenders unconstitutionally.” 1
For seventeen years federal courts had been sentencing offenders unconstitutionally. Think about that. The human cost is incalculable' — thousands of Americans languish in prison under sentences that today are unconstitutional. The institu tional costs are equally enormous — for seventeen years the American jury was disparaged and disregarded in derogation of its constitutional function; a…
2Cases cited117 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- United States v. AliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. GriffinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- United States v. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. RamirezDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.