Legal Opinion

United States v. Kandirakis

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 1, 2006No. Criminal Action 04-10372-WGYPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

YOUNG, District Judge.

“What is overlooked in post -Booker discussions is the fact that, for seventeen years, federal courts had been sentencing offenders unconstitutionally.” 1

For seventeen years federal courts had been sentencing offenders unconstitutionally. Think about that. The human cost is incalculable' — thousands of Americans languish in prison under sentences that today are unconstitutional. The institu tional costs are equally enormous — for seventeen years the American jury was disparaged and disregarded in derogation of its constitutional function; a…

2Cases cited117 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. United States v. AliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. GriffinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  4. United States v. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. RamirezDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API