State v. Hudson County News Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Concurrence · JacobsJacobs, J.
The definition of obscenity is imprecise and the line it draws between the obscene and non-obscene is obviously thin and obscure—so thin and obscure that many thoughtful students believe that the only workable approach is to confine obscenity to what is known as hard-core *267pornography. Although that term itself presents some difficulties, they are much lesser in nature. See Lockhart & McClure, “Censorship of Obscenity: The Developing Constitutional Standards,” 45 Minn. L. Rev. 5, 58-68 (1960). The Supreme Court’s high solicitude for the constitutional freedoms of expression and its actual…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Jacobs.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zeitlin v. ArneberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.