Garber v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:
I. BACKGROUND
On August 8, 2014, I denied defendants’ joint motion for summary judgment in Laumann v. National Hockey League and Garber v. Major League Baseball.1 I ruled that the Office of the Commissioner of Major League. Baseball and other entities related to Major League .Baseball (“MLB Defendants”) were not shielded from antitrust liability by the well-established “baseball exemption.” On August 27, 2014, the MLB Defendants moved to certify an interlocutory appeal on that ruling. On September 8, 2014, Comcast filed a letter on behalf of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Flood v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re Holly Flor and Rudolph Mangels, Debtors. Holly Flor and Rudolph Mangels, Debtors-Appellants v. Bot Financial Corp., Creditor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball ClubsSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- McGraw-Hill Global Educ. Holdings, LLC v. MathraniDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Youngers v. Virtus Investment Partners Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Jackson v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Dist. of Columbia v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Adar Bays, LLC v. Aim Exploration, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.