Legal Opinion
In Re Holly Flor and Rudolph Mangels, Debtors. Holly Flor and Rudolph Mangels, Debtors-Appellants v. Bot Financial Corp., Creditor-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 21, 1996No. 448, Docket 95-5023PublishedCited by 255 opinions
1Per curiam
Debtors Holly Flor and Rudolph Mangels (“Debtors”) appeal from a March 24, 1995 decision of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Alfred V. Covello, Judge) affirming a May 4, 1994 order of the bankruptcy court (Robert L. Krechevsky, Chief Bankruptcy Judge) denying confirmation of Debtors’ Seventh Amended Plan of reorganization pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Debtors implore this court to consider a question of first impression in this circuit: whether debtors may voluntarily contribute a portion of their wages to the funding of a Chapter 11 plan.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Toibb v. RadloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Sonnax Industries, Inc., Debtor. Sonnax Industries, Inc. v. Tri Component Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Westwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. National Fuel Gas Distribution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by255 opinions
- Couch v. Telescope Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- R.F.M.A.S., Inc. v. Mimi SoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Lynn v. Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- In re Facebook, Inc., IPO Securities & Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Robert Ranta v. Thomas GormanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
250 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.