Legal Opinion

State v. Revis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1960No. 75PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bobbitt, .1.

There was plenary evidence tending to support the finding that defendant intentionally shot the deceased and thereby proximately caused his death. Upon such finding, there arose the presumptions that the killing was (1) unlawful and (2) with malice; and, nothing else appearing, defendant would be guilty of murder in the second degree. S. v. Adams, 241 N.C. 559, 85 S.E. 2d 918; S. v. Gordon, 241 N.C. 356, 85 S.E. 2d 322. Thereupon, it was incumbent upon defendant to satisfy the jury of the truth of facts which justi fied or mitigated the killing in accordance with legal principles…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. State v. TolbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Morgan v. Bell Bakeries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. PropstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API