Legal Opinion

State v. Tolbert

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1954No. 657PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BaeNhill, O. J.

It is axiomatic with us that when a complete defense is made out by the State’s evidence, a defendant should be allowed to avail himself of such defense on a demurrer to the evidence under G-.S. 15-173. This is true even when the exculpating evidence is in the form of statements of defendant offered in evidence by the State. S. v. Watts, 224 N.C. 771, 32 S.E. 2d 348; S. v. Todd, 222 N.C. 346, 23 S.E. 2d 47; S. v. Robinson, 229 N.C. 647, 50 S.E. 2d 740.

The State, by offering evidence of the declarations or admissions of a defendant, is not precluded from showing that the facts…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . CohoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. State v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. State v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. State v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. State v. . WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. State v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API