Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Cunningham
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Washington Circuit Court; W. H. Paynter, Special Judge. Action by Jacob B. Cunningham, administrator of the estate of Enoch Morris, deceased, against the Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.
The precipe attached to the transcript filed in this court is entitled “George B. Cunningham, administrator of the estate of Enoch Morris, deceased, v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Company. The plaintiff, as shown by. the record, was Jacob Cunningham, administrator, etc. The assignment of error names Jacob Cunningham, administrator, as appellee. The original hill of exceptions containing the evidence is incorporated into the transcript. The certificate of the clerk of the Washington Circuit Court, attached to the transcript, accords with the form specified in section seven of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Reid v. HoustonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Hadley v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Olds v. ModerwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Barnes v. PelhamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MorreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. RushtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- Pottlitzer v. Citizens Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- National Biscuit Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.