Legal Opinion

Kline v. Ansell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 26, 1980No. [No. 96, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavidson, J.

We shall here consider the question whether the common law cause of action for criminal conversation is viable in Maryland.

On 1 September 1978, in the Circuit Court for Washington County, the appellee, Donald S. Ansell (husband), filed a.two count declaration against the appellant, Floyd R. Kline (paramour), for damages for criminal conversation (count one) and assault (count two). On 16 February 1979, the trial court' directed a verdict against the paramour on the criminal conversation count. The jury found that the paramour had committed an assault upon the husband. It awarded $40,000…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. White v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Harrison v. Montgomery County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Figueiredo-Torres v. NickelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Conaway v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Smith v. DanielczykCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API