Legal Opinion

Branscomb v. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 17, 1926No. 7 Div. 653PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is the second appeal in this cause. Federal Land Bank v. Branscomb, 213 Ala. 567, 105 So. 585.

Upon remandment of the cause following a reversal of the former decree on demurrer, the bill was amended in material respects, the salient features of‘which amendment, in connection, with a brief synopsis of the original bill, appear in the report of the case. From a decree sustaining demurrers to the bill as amended, complainant prosecutes this appeal.

The opinion upon former appeal rested upon the assumption that the respondent Federal Land Bank was an innocent subsequent mortgagee by reason of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sherrill v. Merchants & Mechanics T. & S. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Federal Land Bank v. BranscombSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Fed. Land Bank of New Orleans v. Corinth Bank TrustSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commercial Credit Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. GuySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Sixty St. Francis Street v. AMERICAN SAV. AND LOAN ASS'NSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API