United States v. Specialist BRANDEN D. HEITKAMP
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCHENCK, Senior Judge:
A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of use and possession of marijuana (two specifications and one specification, respectively), possession of 117 tablets of methandienone, 1 carrying a concealed weapon, and possessing drug paraphernalia in an exclusive federal jurisdiction area with intent to process, prepare, package, or store a controlled substance, in violation of Articles 112a and 134, 10 U.S.C. §§ 912a and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. 2 The military judge sentenced appellant to a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. EberleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. ManceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.