Legal Opinion

People v. DeCarlis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 19, 1980No. 79-341PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Deusen

Defendant, Thomas DeCarlis, appeals his conviction and sentence for attempt (armed robbery). The central issue on this appeal is whether the defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel when his privately retained attorney made no motion for discharge under the Illinois speedy trial act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 38, par. 103—5(b)), and failed to object to the introduction of allegedly immaterial evidence.

The general rule in Illinois is that a conviction will be reversed due to incompetence of privately retained counsel only where the representation is of such a low caliber as to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Countee Williams v. John J. Twomey, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  4. People v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Taylor v. Buick Motor Division, General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. McDonaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. LendabarkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. People v. MannaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. People v. HatchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. People v. TurleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API