State v. Plemmons
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStact, C. J.
The defendant is charged with an assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill, inflicting serious injury not resulting in death. This is made a felony by Gr.S. 14-32.
The use of the words “and murder” following the phrase “with intent to kill” in the bill was surplusage and placed no additional burden on the prosecution. The jury was careful to spell out its verdict and the spelling appears to have followed the language of the statute. S. v. Ellison, post, 59; S. v. Lassiter, 208 N.C. 251, 179 S.E. 891.
The defendant complains that the trial court failed to explain to the jury “what is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . HefnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . MarshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- State v. . SpruillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- State v. . GoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- State v. . BentleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. SparksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. CephusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Carolina v. ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.