Legal Opinion

Roy v. Palmateer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 4, 2004No. 00C20058, 01C19972 A116149 (Control), A117045PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*332LANDAU, P. J.

In this Consolidated appeal, plaintiff challenges the trial court’s dismissal of a writ of habeas corpus, its denial of his petition for alternative writ of mandamus, and its imposition of a filing fee in the latter proceeding. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that the trial court erred in dismissing the writ of habeas corpus and, accordingly, reverse the judgment in that case. Based on the trial court’s erroneous imposition of a filing fee, we also vacate the judgment in the mandamus proceeding.

The relevant historical facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff was convicted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bedell v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Gregory v. Salem General HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. McClintock v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fleming v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. Roy v. PalmateerOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Corgain v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Shelby v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Dunn v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API