Legal Opinion

Claim of Day v. Mruk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKimball, J.

On September 22,1952, the petitioner, a member of the police department of the City of Buffalo, applied to the board of police pensions of the city for retirement and pension, pursuant to the provisions of section 464 of the Buffalo City Charter. He had qualified as a policeman June 12, 1930, so that he had slightly over twenty-two years of service. The board of police pensions denied his application, and he instituted this proceeding to compel the board to grant his application. The Special Term granted the petition and ordered the respondents to retire the petitioner on a pension of $2,000…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Roddy v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. New York State Teachers Retirement SystemNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Carroll v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API