Legal Opinion
In re Raphael
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 22, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1966. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Amsterdam, Montgomery County.
Respondent has generally admitted to 11 charges of professional misconduct as specified in a petition of charges brought by petitioner, Committee on Professional Standards (specification 2 of charge II has been withdrawn by petitioner).
Respondent’s poor office procedures and bookkeeping resulted in extensive commingling of his personal funds with those of his clients, in violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility DR 9-102 (A) (22 NYCRR…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re RaphaelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Naiman v. New York University Hospitals CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In re OrseckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re NewbouldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re RaphaelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997