Legal Opinion

Wellitz v. Thomas

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1936No. Appeal, 47PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

On the afternoon of December 6, 1934, the court below, having charged the jury, left instructions that when the verdict was reached, it was to be sealed. The following morning, eleven of the jurors were in the jury box, but the foreman was absent. A minor son of the foreman presented a certificate, from a physician, stating that the juror was too ill to come to court and also a note from the foreman making the same explanation, and submitted an envelope containing the verdict slip. The envelope was torn open and the verdict read to the eleven jurors, who, when asked…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Times Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Kramer v. KisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Eastley v. GlennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Wynkoop v. CoochSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ottavio v. Fibreboard Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Rich v. FinleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Commonwealth v. KramerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Havranek v. PitssburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Finn v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API