Legal Opinion

Schmitz v. Crotty

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 28, 1995No. 93-1650PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Chief Justice.

This case raises the issue of whether the defendant attorney breached the duty of care he owed to the plaintiff beneficiaries in his handling of their mother’s estate as a matter of law. Because the defendant accepted responsibility for the death tax returns he filed on behalf of the plaintiffs’ mother’s estate and the plaintiffs showed defendant’s undisputed mishandling of those returns, we conclude that this is a rare case which requires us to hold in this bench-tried law action that defendant breached his duty to exercise reasonable care as a matter of law. We…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Baker v. BealSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. Whiteaker v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  4. Martinson Manufacturing Co. v. SeerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Katsaris v. ScelsiNew York Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Falczynski v. Amoco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  2. Melissa Stender v. Anthony Zane BlessumSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. Ruden v. JenkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. Kubik v. BurkCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1995
  5. Ahmad S. Vossoughi and C, N, & A, Inc. v. Joseph A. Polaschek and Michael J. MeloySupreme Court of Iowa · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API